[RobertKoch]

Hello,

Saw your medical writer posting. It’s not the role for me — I’m not credentialed in clinical research methodology or IRB protocol drafting, and I wouldn’t pretend to be. But the posting prompted a thought worth sharing.

I’m a retired LAPD officer (1980–2000) and 20-year licensed private investigator who founded the Office of Medical and Scientific Justice in 2009. For eight years, OMSJ successfully defended dozens of state, federal, and military criminal HIV prosecutions — the U.S. Marine case at MCB Camp Pendleton, MCB 29 Palms (charges withdrawn after our expert testimony), State v. Andrews, State v. Perkins, and others where the evidentiary architecture of HIV diagnostic classification was the case-deciding question. I worked with Peter Duesberg, Andrew Wakefield, Meryl Nass, Celia Farber, and Mary Holland (general counsel and current CHD President).

I’ve just finished a 147-page manuscript — POSITIVE: When Signal Became Authority — that lays out the structural argument: antibody tests, PCR signals, and CD4 counts, designed as screening tools, were transformed into legal triggers that imposed criminal penalties, forced treatment, family separation, and lifelong stigma without anyone having to demonstrate actual disease, injury, or transmission. The methodological problem extends directly into infectious disease and PCR-as-cancer-diagnosis, which is what brought me to IMA’s community in the first place via Helen’s group.

If any of IMA’s manuscript pipeline touches diagnostic-classification methodology, evidentiary standards in the courtroom, or the legal-trigger architecture downstream of clinical signals, I’d be glad to be a case-history source or contributor on a per-piece basis — not staff, not paid by the month, just available where my years of court-tested material might strengthen what your physician-scientists are producing.

Either way, glad your work exists. Joseph Varon’s stance during COVID was one of the few clear signals in the noise.