[William Gaspar MD]

I think they deserve the excellent preventative care they mandate for the rest of us. Do the shot. Be safe … or not?

[jwemd]

Our “elected” representatives should have all of the “benefits” to which we “deplorables” are subjected – especially healthcare!

[djoswald]

YES!!

[ActualDrGudel]

Yes, but only if there is a way to verify that they got the true Moderna product rather than a saline placebo as happened with the COVID biologic…

• This reply was modified 5 days, 1 hour ago by  ActualDrGudel. Reason: Correcting misspelling of "Moderna"

[lynn Russell]

There is in humanity a tendency to hurt others who hurt others. Many in this IMA community believe the mRNA injectables to be dangerous. Period. Dangerous means unsafe for anyone. Staying focused on health and safety for everyone seems a productive and beneficial course to pursue. The only way to build trust in the medical community is to be trustworthy in all matters and treat all people equally well. If we do not believe in a so-called remedy, we should not be recommending it for anyone, even those we believe to be responsible for great harm to humanity.

[IMA-HelenT]

Thanks @lynner4u for the alternative view point.

I agree with your core point…informed consent only means something if the same standard applies even when we dislike someone’s choice.

The frustration so many have is understandable because there has been a lack of accountability and too little transparency about what different agencies knew, when they knew it, and how that information was communicated.

But, its true, that frustration shouldn’t turn a question of medical safety into one of punishment.

So we need to fight to ensure here is one standard: genuine informed consent, full transparency about the available evidence and uncertainties, access to alternatives, and the right to make your own decision. And that standard has to apply to everyone, including people whose choices we strongly disagree with.

[Julio Trujillo]

Noup.

The EO should be for investigating how was this approved and by whom.

Mr. RFK Jr. and Dr. Battacharia should be directly questioned about the new mRNA flu vaccine. Maybe they should also answer why is the mRNA injection still defined as a vaccine, right?

[IMA-HelenT]

Good points. Would be great to see them answer these questions.

[Paul Smith]

I totally agree!! Nobody should administer a vaccine to anyone unless they and their entire, eligible family have had the verified vaccine for at least six weeks and all family members are monitored for adverse effects before administrations begin for patients…and manufacturers should be liable for shoddy work or doctored research reports.

[IMA-GregT]

👍

[vegandan]

We don’t need an EO from the President. All we have to do is poll the employees of HHS and see what percentage of them have volunteered for this latest human trial experiment. I would be surprised at anything over about 15%, which would tell me that even they do not believe it is either safe or effective. They need to set the example. If their example is minimal at best, that says it all.

[IMA-HelenT]

Very true, a poll I suspect will never happen for all the reasons you highlight.