[Jeff Gerber]

This was a great talk.

One of the viewers asked about a link between colon cancer and mRNA vaccines. I mentioned DNA fragments showing up in the colon but didn’t have the reference available immediately and I wanted to follow up with this.

https://dailytelegraph.co.nz/covid-19/concerns-raised-after-pfizer-like-plasmids-found-in-cancer-biopsy-of-quadruple-jabbed-patient/

“In a startling discovery, renowned genomic researcher Kevin McKernan has identified Pfizer-like plasmids in a colon cancer biopsy from a patient who had received four doses of the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 ‘vaccine’.”

https://www.canceractive.com/article/dna-fragments%20found%20above%20safety%20limits%20in%20covid%20mrna%20vaccines

“Foreign DNA fragments have now been found in COVID-19 vaccines in more than four studies, this time by the FDA themselves and at levels greater than their own safety figures.”

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9876036/ Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis

“Given that LINE-1 transposition of copied sequences requires cleavage of both strands of the genomic DNA (DSB), unsilencing its activity can cause double-strand DNA breaks in germ-line and somatic cells [100]. In many cancer cells, LINE-1 activity is known to be correlated with p53 mutations and copy number alterations [89] that are key to carcinogenesis, particularly in breast, ovarian, endometrial and colon cancers. “

dailytelegraph.co.nz

Just a moment...

Just a moment...

[Jeff Gerber]

There was a viewer question about Augmented NAC and Dr. Marik expressed some contention about the veracity of Augmented NAC’s claims.

Last month Gordon Medical Forums released video interviews with Fabio Zoffi, Dr. Saleeby, and Dr. Peers, among others. In the interview with Fabio Zoffi he made statements about a way that people will be able to test the effectiveness of Augmented NAC through a urine test that will be released within the next 6 months in a lab in Texas. The technology used is Mass Spectrometry and AI in order to detect spike protein metabolites in the urine. Zoffi says he does have “quite a few questions as to if they are proper indicators of the amount of spike. … I’m not convinced.”

The company does not have publicly facing peer reviewed papers that I have found.

The best I can guess is that if Augmented NAC is indeed as effective as it has been claimed, perhaps the secrecy around it is due to the fact that perhaps they have difficulty patenting the process and if the “how it’s done” gets out, they will be no better than any other company that does the same. Zoffi is a venture capitalist, and he seems sincere to me when I listen to him speak, especially when he publicly admits things like the fact that he himself has doubts about the ability of the tests they are rolling out to accurately measure spike levels.

I’m excited to see what the urine test brings and intend to give it a try for myself when it is available.

Dr. Peers and Dr. Saleeby I suspect might have more inside knowledge on this topic. Dr. Marik is correct to question it since the evidence does not appear to be as open to the public as we would like.

[Jeff Gerber]

I think one other aspect to consider with Augmented NAC is how were their studies performed, in vitro (in glass) or in vivo (in something living). It’s far easier to study in vitro and my guess (for lack of a published paper) is that is how they got to 99% spike protein breakdown versus normal NAC. So, I believe their claims to be true, that they have found a superior way to break down spike protein, however, how does this play out in the body?

The other claim, or estimate, is that it takes 3 months to fully flush the spike protein out of the body. This is likely based on their urine test approach.

So, if the above are true assumptions, then we haven’t really proven that the spike protein has been eliminated from the body after 3 months, we’ve only shown that a test cannot pick it up after approximately 3 months. Here we call into question the accuracy of the test and we don’t have a gold standard to measure it against.

I think they are likely doing good science and reporting truthfully, but the consumer’s understanding of what is being stated is likely where the problem lies.

[IMA-HelenT]

Thank you @jrgerber for this link.

“I’m excited to see what the urine test brings and intend to give it a try for myself when it is available.”

Keep us updated, would love to hear your experience.

[IMA-GregT]

👍 Thanks for that jgerber – much obliged.

[IMA-HelenT]

A link to an episode of Whole Body Health on Augmented NAC. https://imahealth.org/courses/whole-body-health-with-dr-saleeby/lessons/whole-body-health-4/

imahealth.org

Just a moment...

Just a moment...

[Suzana Kalwerd]

A recent study is demonstrating the link between turbo cancer and the mRNA vaccine:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09332-0

This original objective of the study is to demonstrate the link between SARS-Cov-2 and Influenza and the rapid development of metastasis for patient in remission.

In fact, the study links the immune system reaction following Covid with cancer reactivation:

“Here we demonstrate, in mice, that influenza and SARS-CoV-2 infections lead to loss of the pro-dormancy phenotype in breast DCCs in the lung, causing DCC proliferation within days of infection and a massive expansion of carcinoma cells into metastatic lesions within two weeks”

“These phenotypic transitions and expansions are interleukin-6 dependent.”

The mechanism is very fast the number of metastatic cells is increasing rapidly in the following days and weeks after Covid or Influenza. They propose therefore to vaccinate people at risk.

However, other studies have already demonstrated that vaccines are linked to high production of IL6:

“COVID-19 vaccination exacerbates ex vivo IL-6 release from isolated PBMCs”, Nature:

“We show that isolated PBMCs from individuals vaccinated against COVID-19 show a ~ 600-fold increase in basal and a ~ 6000-fold increase in ConA-induced proinflammatory IL-6 secretion”

So: SARS-Cov2 mRNA vaccines triggers an immune response with a very high level of IL6.

And, IL6 level is linked to waking up cancer.

-> SARS-Cov2 vaccine can wake cancer in patient in remission.

nature.com

Respiratory viral infections awaken metastatic breast cancer cells in lungs - Nature

Mouse models show that respiratory infections from viruses such as influenza and SARS-CoV-2 can trigger metastasis of dormant breast cancer cells in the lungs, a finding supported by epidemiological data from two large human cohorts.