[Joyce Anastasia]

Regarding Dr. Cole’s valid question, many people have no idea that most mainstream media outlets operate with deep conflicts of interest, including receiving top advertising dollars from the pharmaceutical and other wealthy companies they are reporting on. How could reporters within those news organizations possibly be neutral and share balanced perspectives regarding these issues when their livelihood as reporters depends on their favorable assessment of those who pay their bills? Of course, this is not the original vow journalists take, and they are often caught between a rock and a hard place ~ report what and how they are “forced” to subtly or not so subtly (Authoritative top-down governance) or get sacked, with 3-5 children to feed. How can we bring more ethical decision-making back into our systems? My experience working with numerous leaders and extraordinary-ordinary people (like you and me) is that as we address those issues within ourselves, we begin to serve as mentors for our families, communities, places of work, and our countries. We can start to speak up, like Dr. Cole did.

Sadly, it is a sacrifice in our world to beoming a truth-seeker and speaker. The more that we can pass the baton and ask for courage (with strength from the heart), the more journalists will speak a greater balanced truth by investigating beyond the surface of repeated sound bites. Media can begin a paradigm shift to its original heart-felt mission and beyond. News can be shared with as much objectivity as possible (without being heartless) and begin to demonstrate the multiple sides to each issue rather than creating a battle between the duality of extreme views based upon the politics of the day. Let’s aim toward that objective so that new well-informed co-creative decisions can be made in every aspect of our lives, especially our health and well-being, for our country and beyond.

May it be so,

(Doc) Joyce

[realworldhope]

I do not work in the medical community but I suspect it being true. Last year my sister was diagnosed with stomach cancer….turbo cancer after back pains one week and escalating tumor in her stomach scanned and biopsied first a couple of weeks, then another. Her govt related employer had required all vaccines. I already followed FLCCC but jumped on the cancer protocol, and my work amazingly coincidentally put me close to the Mexico border for several days, and I was able to get most all the protocol meds there quickly and affordably.

When I got back we put her on most of the protocol, especially Ivermectin three times a day. The tumor though had blocked her stomach from passing food so they had to perform a bypass surgery. Docs said that cancer was growing so fast that she likely had the proverbial 6 months to live with the bypass.

She got progressively worse the weeks later and another scan was taken about 3 weeks after the surgery. She was at a point though that she was so bad that when we wanted to see the later scans that the hospital said that she could not give us permission and no one had a power of attorney or other legal access to her medical records.

A week or so later she acquired sepsis, which was mistreated in our opinion, and passed away in ICU.

End of story? Not at all. After her death a few weeks later with a death certificate in hand we were then able to pick up the later scans. What we read was that the later scans review was that her stomach had been “perforated” during the robot surgery bypass procedure. Stomach acid seeped through that perforation causing the sepsis and a painful death. All that time while in pain we were told it was the escalated cancer.

So she died of medical error. But that’s not all! Those latter scans also showed that a first later scan showed an appreciable decrease in tumor size….now this after a rapid growth the weeks before. A last scan showed that the tumor had decreased by 1/3 in the one month we had her on the Ivermectin and other FLCCC cancer protocol meds.

Speculation but I think those docs at the hospital did not immediately treat the stomach perforation because their judgement was she had a rapidly growing cancer and was going to die from it anyway.

So yes…I suspect a high percentage of deaths are caused by medical error.

[IMA-HelenT]

Thank you @realworldhope for sharing this with us, It’s so hard to lose someone we love, and when it’s from an error that is covered up it adds another layer to the feelings of loss.