Public Forum
Default group for all members. Biological family sometimes get you down? Come join your logical family!
Organizers:
- Organized by
-
-
“Using the judicial bench to deny parents and families informed choices and transparent medical consent is the utmost abuse of power.” – Dr. Ryan Cole, Head of Medical & Scientific Affairs at the Independent Medical Alliance.
-
“Using the judicial bench to deny parents and families informed choices and transparent medical consent is the utmost abuse of power.” – Dr. Ryan Cole, Head of Medical & Scientific Affairs at the Independent Medical Alliance.
Breaking: Biden Appointee Commits Major Judicial Overreach; Arbitrarily Nullifies HHS Secretary’s Authority Over FACA Membership.
Boston-Based US District Judge Brian Murphy Issues Broad Ruling That Effectively Renders Cabinet Secretaries Without Authority to Run Their Agency
FULL STATEMENT: Washington, D.C. — A ruling from District Judge Brian Murphy blocked HHS Secretary Kennedy from appointing members of FACA boards, including the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The ruling in a lawsuit brought by the Big Pharma-backed American Academy of Pediatrics blocked Secretary Kennedy’s 13 appointees to ACIP just days before the March 18-19 committee meeting. The ruling also reinstated government protocols that recommend American children receive dozens of chemical-laden vaccines in the first months of their lives, rather than let parents and doctors decide.“This ruling is judicial overreach to the extreme,” said Dr. Ryan Cole, Head of Medical & Scientific Affairs at the Independent Medical Alliance. “The law is absolutely clear that the Secretary has complete control over FACA board membership, and yet this partisan judge arbitrarily changed the rules without legal precedent.” Federal Management Regulation (FMR), states specifically in 41 CFR § 102-3.130(a) – the regulation that implements the Federal Advisory Committee Act – “Unless otherwise provided by statute, Presidential directive, or other establishment authority, advisory committee members serve at the pleasure of the appointing or inviting authority.”As the head of the agency, the HHS Secretary is the recognized “appointing authority.” A recent national survey conducted by John Zogby Strategies found that 91% of likely voters agree that every individual has the right to informed consent for prescription medications, vaccinations, and all medical interventions.The finding represents one of the strongest supermajorities recorded on any health policy question in recent polling history. “Using the judicial bench to deny parents and families informed choices and transparent medical consent is the utmost abuse of power,” added Dr. Ryan Cole, Head of Medical & Scientific Affairs at the Independent Medical Alliance. “This ruling will be swiftly overturned, and the American Academy of Pediatrics will be shown the door by the medical community.”
-
2 Replies
-
I really thought we might be starting to move forward.
But….the AAP recently won a preliminary ruling from a federal judge that blocks changes made by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The decision temporarily prevents 13 newly appointed members from taking their seats and also invalidates a recent move to reduce the number of recommended infant vaccines.
-
I recieved an email from the CHD today, think this explains a lot…
Buried deep within the 90-page lawsuit that the American Academy of Pediatricians filed against HHS and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lies a cold, hard truth.
The AAP wants the court to reverse recent changes to the childhood vaccine schedule — not because it cares about your children’s health.
The AAP is locked in a fierce fight to protect profits.
The largest lobbying group for pediatricians is running scared. Because the revised vaccine schedule requires doctors to actually discuss the risks and benefits of the vaccines they’re used to “routinely” administering.
Those conversations with parents — plus the prospect of administering fewer vaccines — could dent the bottom lines of pediatric practices built on an ever-growing list of mandated, no-questions-asked injections.
You have to scroll down to page 61 of the AAP lawsuit to read why the AAP believes changes to the vaccine schedule “harm” pediatricians:
- Because the CDC now says that for some vaccines, parents and doctors should decide together if the vaccine is right for a child, Dr. Molly O’Shea will have to “conduct 30-minute appointments” for some vaccines. This change “will disrupt the workflow of her practice.”
- Dr. Aaron Bornstein has seen “a noticeable increase in parent concerns regarding vaccination.” He has also seen “many parents who were on the fence about vaccinating their children and are now choosing not to vaccinate.” And “he and his colleagues have been required to spend time to address them, often without compensation.”
There’s more, but you get the gist.
Parents’ concerns are inconvenient — and addressing them threatens pediatricians’ profits.
Log in to reply.