Here’s more:
We really have to stop lying about the risk and benefit of treatments. Stop using relative risk over absolute risk. Even the doctors don’t understand the studies. So many people are told “Treatment X improves your chances by 50%”, and they think that’s a lot. They don’t understand the absolute risk is often minuscule, and that even at that, to arrive at an average value in a study, some people get better but others get worse.
As an example, there are risk calculators put out by the major cancer centers for my cancer options (like Mayo). Despite being told by several oncologists that I would die without chemo and could be cured with it, the actual calculators based on my tumor characteristics showed the odds of living 10 years going from say 80% to 85%. I pointed hundreds of people to this calculator and most said they were doing it anyway because their doctor said it was a huge benefit and their only chance.
You hear so often “I have to do everything I can” without any understanding that those things you are doing can make you worse or kill you. It’s more a belief that all I have to do is put up with the suffering, then I will increase my chance of survival. Which is totally not true with pharmaceuticals. It IS true with things that actually support your body and immune system, but that isn’t even part of the equation for most people with cancer. Mainstream medical is still in the mindset of eating ice cream to maintain your weight, because diet doesn’t matter.
If cancer societies weren’t controlled by pharmaceuticals, they should be sorting through the studies and options and helping people understand risk/reward.
Lastly, it is very difficult to find naturopathic oncologists. This is very unfortunate. Insurance doesn’t cover them and many are not very good anyway. We need to train huge numbers of them, or train the actual oncologists. In lieu of having good help, there are huge numbers of people who are self-managing based on information they find online. This is not great either.